Inquiry, continued

I’ve decided to begin my blogging inquiry by using two main activities with students – learning (b)logs and commentaries.  I’ll explain both below.

Students will write weekly reflections on their learning under the category Learning (B)logs.   I’m still working on the guiding questions for these Learning (B)logs.  (Though my goal is to teach students to be able to reflect without relying on a prompt, I want to have a rather structured prompt at the beginning to scaffold for students.)

Students will write “commentaries” on class readings a la Sheridan Blau.  This summer, Mr. Blau presented a workshop at UCLA on writing commentaries, which are essentially 1- or 2-page responses to literature (we responded to a poem).  Through writing, sharing, and discussing their commentaries, students develop an understanding of how an academic discourse creates its own conventions and elements, driven by the intellectual needs of the community.  (An example:  an autopsy report is written as straightforwardly as possible, moving from the subject’s head to toes, and including only empirical observation, because its purpose is to be admissible as evidence in court.  Contrast this to a poem or a memoir, whose purpose is of course quite different; how bizarre and even ghoulish it would be if a coroner wrote with “voice” or used figurative language or irony!)

(The commentary is very similar to the Read Around that Bob Land has presented at CSULA for many years.  The Read-Around is described in greater detail in Practical Ideas for Teaching Writing as a Processedited by Bob’s frequent co-researcher, UCI Writing Project director Carol Booth Olson.

I’m trying to imagine how to help students blog about their interests as a kind of “third category,” a category that is student-driven and could take many different forms.

I have two major questions about this.  First, how do I model this for students, especially since I have struggled to maintain a blog myself?  One idea would be to survey students on their interests, and then ask them to read blogs about a particular topic of interest – we could read mentor texts for the “third category” while practicing our writing with the “first” and “second” categories.

Second, how do I “fit this in” to the demands of the pacing plan?  The “commentary” blog posts will fit nicely with the need to have students respond to literature, and the “learning (b)logs” are easy to justify as part of Common Core implementation.  I suppose the “third category” blogs will be the challenge in terms of “fitting it in.”

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s